Categories
Photography

Eyeshot 2024 Street and Documentary Photography Competition

As part of my ongoing efforts to get more comfortable sharing my photographs with a wider audience I started to participate in photographic competitions last year. While I didn’t receive any awards the very act of submitting my work was the personal award that I took away.

This year, for the first time, I’m submitted to a contest with a small fee. I appreciate that many photographers take issue with the “pay to compete” models but this is normal, and I enjoy a level of disposable income that means I can afford to submit to a few contests a year. This post includes the images that I submitted to the Eyeshot 2024 competition, the descriptions I included with the images, and an artist’s statement.

Submitted Images

All of my images are part of a broader documentary project that traces how built environments that I inhabit develop and transform through the seasons, and across the years that I have been photographing my surroundings. As befits this objective, all of my images are titled by their rough location (based on major street intersections), geographic region or city, and the year made.

Great Lakes Waterfront Trail, Toronto, 2024

Toronto is home to a vast waterfront trail which was renovated in 2024 to include a large splash and mist park. On a swelteringly hot day I passed by after it had recently been re-opened and was delighted to see the silhouettes of people — mostly children — playing in the mist, while the looming under-construction condo towers of downtown Toronto provided a sense of youthfulness and activity to the cityscape itself. This photograph captures the youthful energy of Toronto as manifest in its residents and built infrastructures while simultaneously possessing a kind of timelessness as a result of capturing the moment in black and white.

Cumberland & Bellair, Toronto, 2024

One of Toronto’s most posh shopping areas is Yorkville, where the affluent come out to spend and be seen. I like how this monochromatic photograph results in the two women looking like they could have come from 40 or 60 years ago, while the reflection in the window reveals some of the built infrastructure surrounding them. It speaks to a timelessness that is specifically located to being within a large urban environment.

Yonge & Dundas, Toronto, 2024

The Saint Patrick’s Day parade is a major event in Toronto. I’ve been photographing it for years and always march in it to make images of the crowds. I like how the woman in this photograph is almost posing in her winter jacket — it gives her a sense of elegance and self-importance — while, above her, the sign suggests that she is happy we’ve ranked her #1. But in addition to her, the man who is looking on in the right-hand side of the frame adds a degree of electricity to the image with his dourness contrasting with the woman’s own more-positive energy.

Gerrard & Galt, Toronto, 2024

When was this photograph taken? 2024 or 1964? The use of black and white has the effect of confusing the viewer as to when the photograph was made. This is accentuated by the sign in the photograph being from another generation. Adding power to the image are the two figures who are wandering through the early January snow, with the young woman looking down and over to the city’s garbage, and the little boy looking up past the trash to the graffiti on the wall. This speaks to the hopes and ambitions of youth and the practicality of maturity, while they are both literally passing by the abandoned garbage of the day.

Queen & Peter, Toronto, 2023

This photograph is only made possible because of the advertising-heavy urban landscapes in which we live. Taken in downtown Toronto, this photograph juxtaposes a question about one’s life with an idealised (and unrealistic) advertised imagination of excitement, along with a man contemplating his possible future. Him exiting the frame leaves us to wonder whether he will do something to change his life or if, instead, he will continue to live the same life that he always has. We are already left with some sense of his trajectory, however: his walking out to the left of the frame imposes on us a question of whether his movements will take him back to something he once enjoyed in life, or if his retreat through that side of the frame instead symbolises a staidness. Regardless, he will not be moving forward into the future — into the right of the frame — to see some change to his life.

Nathan Phillips Square, Toronto, 2023

Yonge and Dundas Square is Toronto’s imagined equivalent to
Times Square. In this photograph we see it at peak energy: the two women hiding under a transparent umbrella are huddling together with somewhat shocked looks on their faces, while behind them a woman is running from something out of scene and a giant in white strolls behind them. Photographs like this capture the dynamism of our urban landscapes while, simultaneously, not explaining what is specifically occurring. Instead the viewer is merely left with an ever-growing cascade of questions: Why are the women drinking out of a pineapple in the rain? Why are they shocked? Who is chasing the woman in the background? Why is there a tall white giant wandering around? What is going on with the squatting man in the advertisement? These questions draw the viewer in and invite them to create their own stories of what was before, and followed, the 1/320s that this frame holds together.

Artist’s Statement

I’m an amateur Toronto-based documentary and street photographer, and have been making images for over a decade. I make monochromatic photographs that focus on little moments that happen on the streets and which document the ebb and flow of the city over the course of years and decades. My work often deliberately plays with the temporality of photographs and calls into question when images were made, and invites the viewer to ask what specifically happened immediately prior to and following the pressing of the shutter button.

Categories
Photography Writing

Editing and Viewing Smartphone Images Versus Dedicated Camera Images

Manitoba & Nova Scotia, Toronto, 2023

In 2023, Andrea Bianco wrote a lovely long-form meditation on the difference in practice between excellent smart phone cameras (i.e., iPhone 11 Pro) and excellent compact cameras (i.e., Ricoh GR 2). I appreciated that it wasn’t a “smartphones bad and dedicated cameras good” (or the vice versa) kind of assessment. He, instead, considered the utility and capabilities of both classes of cameras. He often noted how phone cameras were best consumed on smaller screens but that their limitations became more apparent when viewed on larger screens.

His post reminded me of some longer-term considerations I’ve had for the past year about the screens on which we assess the images that we make.

Cherry & Polson, Toronto, 2024

Our camera’s screen size, or viewfinder resolution, has an effect on how we compose images. We may try to squeeze in (or exclude) content based on what we can see. However, the screen on which we edit images also affects how we perceive and present the images we have captured.

Editing on smaller screens, such as those used with phones, can lead to presenting images differently than when editing on a larger tablet or computer monitor screen. A figure that is apparent on a 12” or 24” display and is poignant to the photo editing process may functionally be a near-invisible dot on a 6” phone screen.

Eireann Quay & Queens Quay, Toronto, 2024

How we see when editing images, then, will often affect the images which are produced using dedicated cameras by merit of photographers often editing them on larger tablet or laptop screens. By editing on these larger screens we will often make very different editorial or cropping decisions based (in part) on the sheer size of the screen we are reviewing and editing photographs on. The size of the screen (and its quality) affects how we read and interpret our own photographs.

Queen & Bay, Toronto, 2019

The effects of screen size then expand, further, when we consider what screens we use to view other photographers’ work, and correspondingly lead to very different perceptions of work that photographers are digitally displaying. If a photographer edits all their work on a display of 11” or greater, should we not view it with the same size screen to truly read what they are communicating? And, by way of contrast, if a photographer’s photos are all edited on a smartphone then should we view them primarily at the size of a phone? And either way, shouldn’t we view other photographers’ work at peak screen brightness?

Of course we will all use a variety of different screens, of different sizes and luminosity and quality, to look at one another’s work. But because we are both unaware of one another’s editing and viewing defaults it is imperative to think carefully when looking at photographers’ works and ask ourselves: “Do I have the same equipment as they do, to approximate an attempt to see the photograph and scene as they intended for it to be viewed?”


Note: Updated to correctly refer to Andrea’s gender. Apologies!

Categories
Aside

2024.10.14

I’ve been reading Minimalissimo for at least a decade now and have significantly honed my sense of design and style from the work they’ve curated through the years. As of today, however, the website is shifting into archival mode and no new content will be published.

It’s not the first long-term website closing that has hurt — arguably it is Ming Thein’s that still lingers the worse, followed by Andrew Kim’s Minimally Minimal— but at least the archives of Minimalissimo will remain to reflect on in the coming months and years.

Categories
Photography Writing

10 Tips for Starting to Photograph on the Street

2014

The democratization of photography means that there are a lot of people who are interested in making images on the streets. However, many are scared of the possible confrontations they may have after taking other people’s images without first getting their permission. There are innumerable videos and essays that offer a lot of tips, but many of the common “tips” just wouldn’t work for me when I was starting out.

By way of background, I’ve been making images in Toronto since 2014 and have used a range of cameras, focal lengths, and so forth. I started out being very hesitant to take people’s images whereas, today, I am pretty comfortable and they are in the majority of the images that I take each week. You can see my most recent images on my Glass profile.

So here are 10 tips that can help you get used to making images on the street based on my own trepidations when I started out.

1. Just Walk Around With Your Camera

When I first purchased my Olympus EM10-II I was really nervous to actually use it in downtown Toronto. What if someone got mad that I was taking their photo?

2015

So my solution at the outset was just to always be carrying my camera to and from work. I had about a 2-3 km walk each way through urban areas and ensured that I had my camera in my hand the whole time.

For me, just always holding the camera in public normalized how it felt to me. It also helped me better appreciate the weight and how it moved in my hand.

2. Don’t Focus on Being “Stealthy”

So many street photography tips focus on being “stealthy”. That can mean using a long lens so that people don’t know you’re taking their photo, to shooting exclusively from waist height, never raising your camera to your eye, and so forth. But when you’re shooting in a stealthy way and someone approaches you, then you’re put in a position of potentially lying to them if you say you weren’t making images.

2016

By being “stealthy” — especially if you’re nervous about confrontation — and getting caught the potential confrontation may be a lot more emotionally charged. By way of contrast, if you’re not sneaking about and you’re being confronted then the emotions are going to be lower at the outset than if you were caught sneaking a shot of someone.

3. Don’t Focus on the People

If you’re anything like me when I started making images in my downtown core, taking images of people was something I aspired to but wasn’t comfortable with. But I lived in a big urban city and there was always lots to see and make images of…and so I made images of graffiti, of buildings, or of art exhibitions, and so forth. And in all cases the images that I captured were in public with other people around.

2017

Again, the focus (no pun intended) was just to get comfortable using my camera in public. I liked capturing ambient images of the city and its life, but really this was me practicing and just getting used to holding and using my camera in public, with the ultimate ambition of including people in my images.

Bonus Sub-Tip: As part of not focusing on people you can also consider looking for scenes and then waiting for people to just wander through the scene. I often will do this, myself: I’ll find a location, raise my camera to my eye, hold it for a minute or two, and only then start making images. Anyone who comes through the scene knows that I was there first — I wasn’t chasing them to make their image — and if someone asks what I’m doing, I can talk about the scene and what drew me to it. This helps to orient any conversations around specific individuals in your photographs being incidental to the image being taken, as opposed to the individuals being the primary focus of the image itself.

4. Practice With a 50mm or Wider Lens

It’s pretty routine advice to get a prime lens and learn with it, especially when taking images of metropolitan areas. To my mind there are a few good reasons for this approach to learning.

2018

First, just in terms of training, a prime prevents you from certain kinds of indecisiveness. When you’re operating a zoom lens you have to wonder which of the focal lengths are “best” and you don’t necessarily learn to “see” in any particular focal lengths. If you only have a 50mm focal length, by way of comparison, then you quickly learn to “see” in that length. And you can still zoom — it just requires using your feet!

Second, a prime lens helps you determine what kinds of images you are, or are not, looking to make. If you’re using a 50mm lens then very wide street images that you can capture with a 28mm are just not going to be made. And that’s fine — you learn to look for images that align with that particular focal length. By imposing a series of restrictions on how you can make an image you can expand your creativity by just focusing on what that focal length can produce.

2019

Third, using a single prime lens will mean that you’re carrying less weight and you won’t end up carrying a whole pile of kit with you. Which brings us to the next tip…

5. Don’t Trudge Around with More Than 1-2 Lenses

If you’re going to wander around the streets then you will benefit from not carrying too many lenses. I’d recommend only stepping out the door with your one prime lens. Not only does having a few lenses lead to creative ambiguity — is lens 1 or 2 or 3 “right” for this scene? — but it means you have to carry more stuff on your person.

Down But Not Out, 2020

Less weight and fewer focal lengths options means that you may be out making images longer and with more creative discipline. And by really leaning into 1 or 2 fixed focal lengths you’ll learn a lot about whether you like those focal lengths and, as importantly, how you can use them when making images.1

6. Go to Events Where Taking Photographs is Normalized

If there’s a parade, or public art show, or whatever then try to get there and practice taking images of people in those venues. Because it’s a big public event people will tend to be pretty OK with their images being taken. And it will also expose you, a budding photographer, to the challenge of sometimes grabbing a shot in changing light, moving crowds, and so forth.

Joy In Dark Times, 2021

If you’re feeling particularly daring then you might consider walking alongside a parade or protest, and make images of those who are viewing the event. It’s the “one step up” from making images of the participants of parades and events but still pretty comfortable. Most people in crowds are going to be OK with their images being captured and you’ll have walked past anyone who happened to be annoyed at your photographing them before they emerge from the crowds.

7. Go Out a Lot

I try to get onto the streets for a couple hours every weekend. I have a busy full-time job and photography is my hobby, so I don’t worry about not being able to devote a hour or more every day into making images. I’d love to be able to do so but it’s just not my reality.

Fix, Found, 2022

This having been said I am always out each weekend. Every year I make thousand of frames and often keep returning to the same spots year over year over year in the hopes of some scenes finally producing an image that I like. And by going out you both get a sense for how light falls in your environments, how people move in them, as well as how the urban environment changes through the year. The more you can predict about the environment and its inhabitants the more likely it is that you’ll collect images that speak to you.

8. Review Your Work

Figure out a review tempo for your work and then keep to it. There are at least two parts to this.

First, you need to review the images that you’re making on the streets. I tend to do quick reviews when I come back but other folks do so days or weeks later. Whatever your tempo is it’ll be important to look to see what you’re capturing. It’s the only way to really understand how your creative vision is being interpreted using the camera and lens that you’re carrying.

Toronto, 2023

Second, I’d encourage you to do either monthly, quarterly, bi-annual, or annual assessments of the images that you’re taking. Go through and pick out your top 10-20 images and really think about why they’re your favourites. And, also, how would you want them to be improved? What more might you have done?

As you go through more of these reviews also do comparisons to past favourite images — it’s by undertaking this kind of self-assessment or critique that you’ll be able to see whether you are growing or stretching as a photographer, as well as detect themes or commonalities in what you are being attracted towards.

9. Post Some of Your Work Online

Lots of photographers use some kind of online service to post their images. What you use doesn’t really matter. But having a published set of images means that if someone does ask you what you’re doing on the streets, you can quickly direct them to your online work so they can see you’re doing something artistic and genuine.

Cumberland & Bellair, Toronto, 2024

If someone does ask about you about what you’re doing just be honest: you’re starting out as a photographer and like capturing urban environments. Maybe the person in question looked interesting. And you can show them a selection of your work which will reveal you are treating photography at least somewhat seriously as opposed to just taking creepy shots of people on the street.2

10. Have Fun and Ignore Equipment

Street photography is a fun hobby whether you’re out with a smartphone camera, using a film camera or DSLR, or playing with a mirrorless camera. Don’t worry about having “the right” camera or one that is sufficiently new. Any camera that has been made in the past 10 years is going to be more than enough when you’re in the streets for the first time. Don’t focus on the equipment and, instead, just enjoy the fun that comes from focusing intently on the built environment, light, and the people who pass through the streets.

Princess & Nunavut (CNE), Toronto, 2024

Those are my own 10 tips — what tips would you give a younger version of yourself, today, based on your experiences to date?


  1. If you just want to use the kit lens that came with your camera — likely a zoom lens — then just set it to a single fixed focal lens and restrict in in place with some electrical tape. ↩︎
  2. Of course, if you are just taking creepy shots of people — such as some street photographers who use massive zoom lenses to exclusively take long distance photographs of attractive people — then this will just “out” you and what you’re up to. Don’t be one of those people! ↩︎
Categories
Aside

2024.9.17

In an unexpected but pleasant twist, tonight, I chatted with a friend about what I saw in the images I’d posted to Glass throughout the year. He has an artistic background and was often able to see — and speak to — things that I’d not considered previously. It’s also clear that I’m getting better at explaining and outlining what’s in my images, the common thematics and how they’re developing over time, and able to provide critique to past work.

So a pleasant twist and progress!

Categories
Photography

Accidentally Discovered Street Photos

I recently purchased Conversations with Contemporary Photographers, following my recent reading of On Street Photography and the Poetic Image. As a bit of a surprise, I discovered that my recently purchased book included a strip of exposed Kodak 100TX film. I don’t think I’ve actually seen or held a strip of physical film before and I certainly haven’t ever tried to digitize it before today.

Given that this was a bit of a lark I ended up using Filmbox to create quick digital scans. This is a an iOS application where you hold the film a few inches away from a white screen and, then, use the application to capture any given frame.

I can’t claim that the process is perfect nor that the results are spectacular. But they do have the effect of letting me see more clearly what the different frames on this thing strip of film more clearly look like.

None of these photos were made by me. I have no idea where they were made. But I suspect the film is from within the past 20 years or so, based on the clothing when when the book was published. All of them are reproduced, below, with the only ‘edit’ being to fully convert them to black and white.

Categories
Photography

Adding Geolocation Information Into Apple Photos

Ted Rogers & Charles, Toronto, 2024

One of the best things about the iPhone is that each photo that you take automatically can be geolocated. I really appreciate this because I can quickly ‘zoom into’ different parts of the world and see the images I took in that place.

However, I take very few iPhone photos these days. For the past several years almost all of my images were made on either a Fuji X100F, Leica Q2, or a Ricoh GR or GRIIIx. None of these cameras have GPS modules. The result is that they do not natively add geolocation, or GPS, information into images metadata.

Fuji and Leica do have apps that you can use to add GPS information to photos taken with their respective cameras. However, actually setting them up takes a number of steps. Moreover, it requires you to have — and open — applications associated with the camera I’m using at any given time.

Instead of using manufacturer-specific applications I have purchased lifetime licences for Geotags Photos Pro 2 and Geotag Photos Tagger.1 In Canada, the Geotags Photos Pro 2 was just $15 and Geotags Photo Tagger is $12. While not free, the I use the applications each week and I’m well below $1/use at this point, and all of my photos for over the past year are accurately tagged.

Using the applications, and adding the metadata, is very easy. Once you ensure that you’ve set the timezones up correctly between your camera and the application….you’re finished. All you need to do is activate Geotags Photos Pro 2 ahead of going out for a photowalk (I tend to have it collect the GPS information every 5 minutes) and, after the photowalk, I put all my images into Apple Photos and then open Geotags Photos Tagger to apply the GPS information to all the images I’ve taken.

That’s it: once you’ve done this you’re done.

As a street photographer I’m most interested in posting photos with names that include the cross-streets of where an image was taken. So having GPS information is helpful for this purpose. But when I’ve been out for hikes it also does a good job locating different photographs that I’ve made — so long as my phone can get geolocation information I can then add the data to my mirror less camera images.

In conclusion: If you’re looking for a pretty easy, and affordable, way of adding GPS data to your images I can’t recommend these two applications enough!


  1. These applications are available for both iOS and Android. ↩︎
Categories
Photography Writing

Sharing Photographs, and Photography, with Others and Growing as a Photographer

Great Lakes Waterfront Trail, Toronto, 2024

Like many other photographers I regularly share my images through a social media platform. I also sometimes post them on this website. And that’s fine and good. And because it’s so normalized it feels very safe; while I might get positive comments from other users it’s the not the same as sharing my work where it might be assessed or publicly reviewed by people who are far more experienced by me, and where those considerations might she shared with a very large set of viewers.

Over the past year I’ve tried to push myself out of my comfort zone. I’ve been more active in thinking about street photography and sharing it with a part of the photographic community — the Photowalk Show — and then sometimes having those thoughts shared with Neale James’ other listeners. I submitted a few photos to a competition for the first time. I described for the first time the motivations and philosophy that underlie my street photography to a (friendly) group of strangers while also sharing an associated sequence of my photographs. I’ve had one of my photos highlighted in a roundup by Glass. And so on.

The White House, Washington, DC, 2023

But the scariest thing has been associated with my postcards project. To be clear, actually printing those postcards wasn’t scary at all! But actually sending them to people — with the prospect they would look at a cohesive bit of my work and then offer commentary to potentially hundreds or thousands of people — has been intimidating because it constitutes an exposure of my amateur photography to an otherwise unknown set of publics.

Crescent & Cluny, Toronto, 2024

I’m not afraid of publicity or engaging with publics. I’ve been very involved in public life for the past 15 years, and am as comfortable speaking with leaders of government or other senior leaders as I am appearing on television and speaking to tens or hundreds of thousands of people. But the sharing of my photographic hobby is different because it isn’t a domain where I’m a well-credentialed expert: I’m very much a learning amateur when it comes to photography. While I take my hobby very seriously I don’t have the skills or experience that parallel those of a more seasoned or professional photographer.

Yonge & Dundas, Toronto, 2024

I recognize that sharing my work, be it with Neale James and his Photowalk Podcast, or with Ted Forbes and his Art of Photography YouTube channel, has been a real step for me. It represents my ever deepening appreciation for the art form and my starting to explore ways of more broadly sharing my work, as well as developing increasing confidence in what I’m making. I’ve got an long way to go in deepening my expertise in making the kinds of photos I want to make but I feel more confident in what I’m doing, today, than I did even a year ago.

Categories
Photography

Bastion & Fort York, Toronto, 2023

Bastion & Fort York, Toronto, 2023

This is one of my 12 preferred landscape/cityscape images from 2023, which I created (but didn’t print) alongside my 2023 Postcard project.

The photograph has a few things happening to my eyes: there’s the wildness in the foreground and a bit of roughness with the graffiti, that then passes into the rustic fortress that defended Toronto over a century ago, and then the new/under construction parts of Toronto. While it formally lacks any humans in the scene it radiates humanity in each gradation of the image, while also communicating a kind of evolution of Toronto’s emergence over time.

Categories
Photography Writing

Structured Thoughts on Social Media

College & Manning, Toronto, 2024

Neale James, host of the Photowalk, put out a call last month where he asked listeners to the podcast to offer some thoughts about social media. The episode that arose from listeners’ considerations is live and I’ve provided my (slightly edited) full response to Neale below.

By way of background, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about social media professionally in a number of ways, used it professionally to affect political change, and have also used it personally now for over 20 years at this point.

How do you use it?

One of my many positive early memories of social media is how, over 10 years ago, I and a series of cybersecurity researchers used Twitter to coordinate an incident response that led us to realise that the government of Iran was intercepting Google traffic being delivered to residents of Iran. That led to the resolution of the issue and stopped that government from conducting surveillance of its residents using the technique in question. So a good thing! Overall, up until about a year ago I used Twitter constantly for professional purposes.

However, the implosion of Twitter under Elon Musk, combined with moving into a privacy regulator’s office, has meant that I’ve stepped back from the same professional presence. I’ve trained the LinkedIn algorithm so it surfaces valuable professional content in my current role, but I don’t really use other social media professionally at this point.

Personally, the only truly valuable social media service that I use, and participate on, is Glass. It’s a small and paid photo sharing site. The community is positive and active, and it features interesting photography from around the world. I’ve also been blogging, now, since the 2002, and continue to keep that up as another outlet.1

Do you engage more, or less, with social media than you once did?

Less than in the past. Some of this is time. Some of it is, as mentioned, due to changes in the networks (e.g., Twitter) or the scattering of the communities (see again: Twitter) and the changing of my job.

I continue to use Glass, however, with a high degree of frequency and visit once or twice a day to see new images and I post one image per day.

What is your favourite platform and why?

For photographic purposes, Glass. It’s not as interactive as some other services which is fine, really, because I can go in and see things/comments, and then leave. There isn’t an algorithm that’s trying to keep me interested in perpetuity. It’s a healthier way for me to interact with other people online.

Explain your feelings about the currency of likes…

They’re…not good? I mean, they give quite the dopamine hit! But it also interferes with why you might create work, or explore producing new kinds of work. We know that certain kinds of images will get more likes due to smaller screens and shorter attention spans as we skim images; removing likes — or at least deprioritizing them in the user interface — can have the effect of encouraging people to explore different kinds of practice and without a sense that the new isn’t less liked.

What has it done for photography?

It’s easy to say that likes have done bad things to photography. But I really don’t know that that’s fair or even necessarily correct.

There are a lot more people making photographs than ever before. And part of the process tends to be learning how other people tried to make images: how many of us spent time to figure out how to make silhouettes? And with the ‘like’ metric you can get a rough guesstimate of whether you’re getting better and better at this kind of classic image. The same is true for lots of other ‘standard’ kinds of images. I think that’s great! People are better photographers on average, today, than ever before. We should celebrate that more often than we tend to.

Where I think that likes can be harmful is that they can stunt photographic growth or exploration. Also, due to how algorithms work, ‘low like’ content might be hidden and thus prevent the artist from receiving feedback on positive areas to improve towards. And, of course, there can be mental health issues when individuals ‘bully’ one another by providing or depriving individuals of likes. All of those aren’t great outcomes.

What would the perfect platform look like?

Utopia and dystopia: both places that don’t exist in reality, and neither of which is a place that you likely ever want to end up in.

All of which is to say, I think there are different characteristics of social media sites and you can dial those characteristics up or down and you create different kinds of sites and experiences. A few ‘dials’:

  • How ‘chatty’ or conversational is the environment? Does ‘community’ involve direct messages?
  • How compressed are the images? Is it build for phone screens, tablet screens, monitors, or…?
  • How effectively are you introduced to/able to discover new photographers?
  • What is the information density — how much is on the screen at once?
  • What is/isn’t made public? And how? Do you list numbers of followers, likes, etc?
  • How much are you appealing to the masses vs dedicated photography enthusiasts?
  • Monetized by users paying money, or monetizing the users?
  • Is it a ‘hot’ medium (e.g., sound and video) or a bit ‘colder’ of a medium (e.g., photographs and text)?
  • How personalized is the experience (i.e., lots of algorithmic engagement vs just find it on your own)?
  • Is there an assertive and active safety team that blocks certain content from appearing on the site?

When you adjust just some of those dials you affect the nature of the site, the number of users that you need to be revenue neutral, and affect how people will interact with one another. What I think is better will be worse for others, and vice versa.

I actually think that there should, ideally, be a diversity of experiences. And that it’s fine if different little groups form across the Internet that enjoy their parts of the Internet differently. There’s no reason why a half-dozen different photographic social media sites cannot exist, as an example, nor is it really a problem if you aren’t engaging with all of them. Find a site that has the ‘dials’ adjusted to your tastes and you’ll have hopefully found an environment — and user base — that you can enjoy and thrive with.

Tell me about the good bits, the bad bits, and all the bits in between…

I’m sure that I could go on in more depth but won’t drag on. Suffice to say that I think — hell, I know based on my professional experiences — that social media can be powerful and important and enable lots of good things in the world. But, at the same time, it can foster anti-social behaviours, be used to fuel genocide, and just be a depressive hellscape.

This isn’t to say that technology is neutral, however: all technologies as they are designed have particular affordances. Those affordances are linked to how those dials are turned. And there are certainly some ways of turning the dials that are not particularly good for humans, even if we enjoy those sites like sugary food, and other ways that are better, which are more like a banana or apple or something that has a modicum of healthiness.

We shouldn’t demand that everything is digitally healthy — we should be able to enjoy cheeseburgers and poutine now and again!! — but the totality of our dining establishments shouldn’t be fast food and deep fried food. Because we know that it’s really not good for us.


  1. Though all those earlier blogs have long since been scrubbed from the Internet and archived in a place no-one can find in storage. Which is a relief as no-one needs to be reminded of what I was like online in the early 2000s! ↩︎