Categories
Writing

Feature Parity in Apple Notes

I have a love and occasional hate relationship with Apple Notes. And a mostly hate and kind fond memory relationship with my longstanding notes application, Evernote. So for the past few months I’ve slowly and tediously shifting a few thousand notes from one service to another.

This is the story of why, the joys and miseries of the decision, and what I hope Apple changes in future versions of its note taking application.

Evernote’s Trust and Pricing Deficit

Evernote has some serous problems to my eye. I like some of its features, such as the ability to search .PDFs and adding tags to different notes. But these features aren’t enough to overcome the baseline problem that I no longer trust Evernote with my content. There are two core reasons underscoring this lack of trust: the company’s questionable stance on users’ privacy and the company’s willingness to increase prices without providing a corresponding improvement in their services.

In case you missed it, Evernote announced a plan to have specific employees read the content their users added to their notes. The employee would be reading users’ notes to improve on the machine learning algorithms that Evernote was rolling out. Those algorithms, themselves, meant to improve the services provided to users.

So the company was only going to infringe on its users’ privacy for the best of reasons.

The company backed off from its decision pretty quickly in the wake of a media backlash. Nevertheless, the initial decision left a bad taste in my mouth. How could I trust a company that had so cavalierly indicated a willingness to intrude upon their users’ private content? Some people use Evernote for personal journaling, others to manage their businesses, some to store medical information, and yet others for their research and professional writing. On what possible grounds could anyone at a company based on storing people’s thoughts and dreams think it would be appropriate to have employees read potentially sensitive notes? I was already somewhat uneasy with the company but seriously started exploring ways out of their service following this particular privacy SANFU.

The second problem I had with the company was its decision to raise prices for professional users without providing a real benefit to end users. I get that companies sometimes have to adjust their pricing but as a long-standing user it seemed like I was being penalized after trusting the company in its infancy. It just seemed wrong to penalize very early adopters such as myself who’d championed the application from an early point in the company’s existence. There should have been a grace period, at the very least, if not an actual grandfathering of long term users’ prices.

So in the advent of these issues, combined with a decreasing enjoyment of the user interface and user experience more generally, I decided that I wanted out.

Enter Apple Notes

I’ve used Apple Notes off and on for a lot of years. And until the updates that came in iOS 9 I’ve generally stayed away. The service has just been deeply underwhelming in terms of its organization of different notes, to say nothing of the annoyances I had with sharing notes with other people.

The worst of those annoyances have been dealt with in a few ways:

  1. I can organize folders and use macOS to nest different folders in one another, which is essential for me to keep my notes in some semblance of order.
  2. I can search through notes with relative ease on all my Apple devices, though I admit this is an area where improvements would be delightful.
  3. I have more faith in Apple to push back against efforts to access my notes through a legal process, and to protect the privacy of my notes’ contents using best security practices.

Furthermore, I’m already paying for iCloud storage. As a result, shifting my Evernote documents to Apple Notes will likely leave me with a little more money in my bank account each year.

The actual writing experience in Apple Notes is a bit threadbare. That’s ok on the whole – the ability to add headings and titles, along with some baseline formatting is almost enough – and share sheets have made it a lot more pleasant to send a note to a colleague or collaborator.

Aside: The Miseries of Note Migration

There are some automated ways to pull data out of Evernote and into other note taking applications, including Apple Notes. But I’m not using them for two separate reasons.

First, I want to be able to re-curate all the stuff that’s collected in Evernote over then past years. So that means that I want to put my own eyes on old notes to determine what should and shouldn’t make the cut. I’ve shed about a thousand notes thus far and I’m pretty sure that even are going to vanish into the digital ether.

Second, the way I organized notes in Evernote changed over the years that I was using it. I did a lot of learning while using the application which mean that I changed my tagging and notebook structures a few times. That meant there was a pretty bad mess I’d built up and I wanted that cleaned up.

I should acknowledge that Evernote also put a lot of really badly formatted notes in my various notebooks and I’m spending more time than is really appropriate to fix up those notes. Specifically, I used the company’s web clipping tool on a regular basis and the way it clipped pages was often sub-par (to be generous). In some cases it meant that HTML was laced through notes. In others, the clipped pages were filled with ads and other badly formatted junk; this was the result of website publishers having to incorporate ads and ruin the user experience.

I should be blunt: I was working around the deficiencies of Evernote’s clipping service. Apple Notes has its own problems and deficiencies and, between the two, Evernote is actually better at clipping than Apple.

Limitations of Apple Notes

There’s still room for improvements with Apple Notes.

iOS is definitely an area that is still developing, and I periodically come across things that haven’t been implemented for some reason. One of the teething struggles associated with iOS’s Notes s linked with share sheets: why can I share a note with someone, but not a folder containing multiple notes? My use case is this: I often collect resources for ongoing projects in folders and it’d be great to be able to share all of those items, at once, as opposed to on an individual basis.

In a related vein, I’d be delightful to be able to:

  • Add hyperlinks to text in the Notes applications for iOS;
  • Create sub-folders in the iOS application (I can do it in macOS so why not in iOS?);
  • In macOS, automatically create a note when I drag a file — such as a .pdf, .doc, or other file — into the application.

I also really, really wish that Notes on iOS and macOS supported smart folders and tags. macOS already supports that kinds of functionality in Finder and (to an extent) iTunes and Photos! Adding these kinds of functions into the Notes application would mean I could more easily use the same note in multiple folders. The use case? I often keep reviews of articles and documents in Apple Notes and subsequently want to organize them into additional folders for specific papers that I’m writing or blog posts I’m drafting. As it stands now I need to make total copies of notes and re-create them in folders for the given paper or blog. That’s nuts: I shouldn’t be doubling or tripling notes.

But maybe it’s just too hard to do all that. So if I had to ask for a smaller thing it’d be this: please, please, please just let me pin important notes to the top of different folders in notes.

Finally, it’d be amazing if there was some integration of Markdown functionality. I don’t imagine that’s going to happen anytime soon, but it’d be nice.1 A better web clipping service would also be helpful: Evernote did a not good but generally serviceable if not good job of that and Notes just sucks in comparison.

NOTE: This was originally posted on Medium.


  1. 1: Yes, services like Bear might actually provide a better experience. And its support for Markdown makes it super tempting. But I’d rather pay for fewer services as part of some 2017 ‘financial cleaning’. ↩︎
Categories
Reviews

Review: Security Engineering

Anderson has successfully synthesized an incredibly diverse set of literature and, as a result, the book is useful for any person who is involved in security. The first section of the book outlines different threat models, offers accessible ways to develop and implement security designs, and also addresses issues of economics, psychology, and basic security issues that must be considered from the outset of security planning. Because different threat situations are raised throughout the book the reader will learn to appreciate the value of adopting comprehensive threat planning. This approach is not meant to drive a ‘secure everything’ mentality but to encourage readers to reflect on, and understand, what is actually being protected, why it is being protected, and what it is being protected from. As a result, a manager or team lead not invested in the day-to-day securing of a principle can have intelligent and critical discussions with their security staff, ensuring that principles are properly identified and resources assigned to ensure desired levels of threat protection. For staff involved in implementing policy, reading this first section may help to couch concerns in a language that is better understood by management. It will also let those same staff members more precisely plan and implement policies that are handed down from higher levels in an organizational framework. 

In the second section of the book, Anderson addresses a series of ‘topic areas’ such as multilateral security, banking and bookkeeping, monitoring and metering, security printing and seals, API attacks, copyright, telecom security, and more. In each section he leaves the reader with an excellent topical understanding of the historical issues these areas have encountered, how issues in various sections often relate to one another, and where and why errors in judgement have been made. The regular demonstrations of security failures – often due to side channel attacks – operate as powerful reminders that adequate policies that precisely identify how fault situations unfold are (arguably) amongst the most important elements of any security policy. It also demonstrates how what appear to be robust systems can be made to be quite brittle, thus emphasizing the need to think about how to develop effective defence in depth policies. This section is essential reading for both the actual implementers of security as well as whomever is making purchasing decisions on behalf of organizations. With the rapid growth of the ‘security industry’ and ever-increasing number of vendors that are invested in selling their latest products/snake oil, this section provides the reader with tools needed to critically interrogate products and make better purchasing and implementation decisions. 

The final section is, arguably, most needed by mid- to high-level organizational planners. Civil issues are raised – how does security/surveillance impact individuals’  rights? – as are step-by-step methodological systems for establishing threat patterns in relation to larger organizational concerns (e.g. profitability, consumer loyalty and trust). It also includes suggested practices for addressing potential security errors introduced in the generation of a digital or coded product, and how to establish an environment conducive to ensuring product- and process-based integrity, authenticity, and security. The final section is particularly needed for anyone looking into compliance seals and assurances. Anderson outlines the positive and deficient aspects of external audits, and also identifies how auditing systems have been gamed by nation-state actors and the reasons behind such gaming. While some organizations may be more concerned about receiving seals for bureaucratic purposes, for the agency that is concerned about the actual security value of the seals, this section provides much-needed resources to understand the nature of seal and certification systems. 

I cannot recommend this book highly enough. Quite often, security books will emphasize a particular line of attack and bypass the broader conceptual systems underlying the incursion. This book largely takes the opposite track, focusing first on the conceptual deficiencies and the intellectual demands of designing secure systems. It then proceeds to outline attacks that often use the systems’ logic to the attackers advantage. As a result, the reader will leave with a critical appreciation of the concepts and implementations of security. The emphasis on the conceptual conditions of security mean that the book will continue to age well, with readers being able to apply what is learned in this book to their work for years to come. 

Categories
Links

Moto Z Play review: the best battery life of any smartphone today

But the Moto Z Play rarely feels like you’re doing much settling. Even when you add together the negatives like an average camera, Verizon’s annoying bloatware, and Lenovo’s poor track record with software updates, the Moto Z Play’s affordable price, zippy performance, and unbelievable battery life still add up to something very compelling. And yes, unlike the Z and Z Force, there’s even a headphone jack built in. Forget the Z’s before it; this is the practical Moto Z that most people should get. It’s available exclusively from Verizon Wireless for a limited time for $408, but starting in October you can get it unlocked on GSM carriers (and free of carrier bloat) for $450.

The Verge notes that if you buy a Moto Z you’re unlikely to get “software updates”. That doesn’t just mean you won’t get bells and whistles and neat new features as Google releases new versions of their operating system. It also means that Lenovo will not send you security updates. So you’ll have a long-lasting smartphone that is insecure to trivial attacks that could extract sensitive personal information or otherwise compromise your device.

But other than that, I’m sure it’s a great phone to recommend.

Categories
Links

The Best Coffee Roasters in Toronto

Only helpful for those local to Toronto, but it’s great for those of us that are. I particularly enjoy Pilot and Propeller, though admit that my favorite place to get coffee these days is from Ideal Coffee (the Red Sea beans are absolutely terrific). Still, I look forward to trying the whole list and determining if there is a company that can unseat Ideal Coffee or Pilot and Propeller!

The Best Coffee Roasters in Toronto

Categories
Links

CSIS’s New Powers Demand New Accountability Mechanisms

CSIS’s New Powers Demand New Accountability Mechanisms:

It is imperative that the Canadian public trust that CSIS is not acting in a lawless manner. And while improving how SIRC functions, or adding Parliamentary review, could regain or maintain that trust, a more cost-sensitive approach could involve statutory reporting. Regardless, something must be done to ensure that CSIS’ actions remain fully accountable to the public, especially given the new powers the Service may soon enjoy. Doing anything less would irresponsibly expand the state’s surveillance capabilities and threaten to dilute the public’s trust in its intelligence and security service.

 

Categories
Quotations

2013.3.9

…nowhere does he raise the possibility that feedback loops produced by digital technologies might also be harming governance. Consider a 2011 survey by a British insurance company in which 11 percent of respondents claimed to have seen an incident but chose not to report it, worried that higher crime statistics for their neighborhood would significantly reduce the value of their properties. In this case, the quality of future data is intricately dependent on how much of the current data is disclosed; unconditional “openness” is the wrong move here—precisely because of feedback loops.

Evgeny Morozov, review of Future Shock

I would note that this failure to appreciate the social implications of novel monitoring technologies is something that is drastically unappreciated by public policy planners.

Categories
Quotations

2013.2.5

The totalizers would happily follow Johnson in seeking answers to questions such as “So what does the Internet want?”—as if the Internet were a living thing with its own agenda and its own rights. Cue a recent Al Jazeera column: “The internet is not territory to be conquered, but life to be preserved and allowed to evolve freely. … From understanding the internet as a life form that is in part human, it follows that the internet itself has rights.”13 That is the kind of crazy talk to be avoided. The particularizers would not invoke “the Internet” to embark on a quixotic attempt to re-make democratic politics; but the totalizers, in their quasi-religious belief, would do so gladly.

A good account of the Internet would never need to mention that dreadful word at all. This stringent requirement might uproot most of our Internet thinkers from the plateau of banal and erroneous generalizations where they have resided for the last two decades; after all, it is the very notion of “the Internet” that has allowed them to stay there for so long. Now that Internet-centrism is not just a style of thought but also an excuse for a naïve and damaging political ideology, the costs of letting its corrosive influence go unnoticed have become too high.

Evgeny Morozov, a Review of Future Perfect: The Case for Progress in a Networked Age
Categories
Humour Videos

A truly excellent parody of The Verge’s product reviews