
Slightly Cloudy


Ming Thein:
We’ve touched on the cliches, we’ve touched on the physiology (much more detail in this and this article) but we haven’t touched on some things that generally make sense; I use the term ‘generally’ because as always there are exceptions dependent on the subject, scene and communicative intent of the photographer. Whilst for instance hard shadows usually make for interesting architectural images, they aren’t always so good for senior portraits or product photography. But this can be simplified into a logical statement like “shadows can assist with spatial orientation of a composition, and enhancing texture” – which I think is legitimate. But ultimately, the photographer has to decide if they actually want an obvious spatial orientation or not – they may not, for instance, if the intention is to make an extremely abstract composition. The example images given deliberately violate at least one, sometimes more, of the commonly bandied photographic rules – yet to my eyes at least, they still work.
I hadn’t really considered how the human body helps to dictate or guide the ‘rules’ of photography. While Ming Thein’s discussion is brief it’s perhaps useful for opening up new ways of thinking about the photos that we choose to take, and how deliberate shots vary from snapshots.

Have you been naughty? Nice? Santa knows because his minions have been … watching …


![]()
Photo made with iPhone 7 and Halide in a parkette on December 7, 2017. Edited in Snapseed.
![]()
Photo made with Olympus E-M10ii and Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm F1.8 in Kensington Market on September 17, 2017 in Toronto, Ontario. Edited in Apple Photos.
A great, and as always helpful, reminder that what matters most isn’t the equipment you carry but your creativity and desire to use it on a regular basis.
![]()
Photo made with Olympus E-M10ii and Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 II R at Niagara Falls on October 15, 2017 in Niagara Falls, Ontario. Edited in Apple Photos.
![]()
Having followed Facebook for a long time, I know what really plagues the company is that being open and transparent is not part of its DNA. This combination of secrecy, microtargeting and addiction to growth at any cost is the real challenge. The company’s entire strategy is based on targeting, monetizing and advertising.
Common sense ideas such as being humane, understanding its impact on society and civic infrastructure — well that doesn’t bring any dollars into the coffers. Call me cynical, but reactive apologies are nothing but spin.
So very true.